You may have heard it said that if you and your cohost always agree, one of you is unnecessary. That idea comes from a quotation by William Wrigley Jr.:
When two men always agree, one of them is unnecessary.
—William Wrigley, Jr., “Spunk Never Cost a Man a Job Worth Having,” The American Magazine, March 1931
There is some truth in the warning. A group of yes-men can make poor decisions because nobody challenges the ideas being presented. Healthy questions and thoughtful pushback can make a business, a team, or a podcast stronger.
But I don’t think you should choose a podcast cohost simply because they disagree with you. A good cohost does more than provide opposition. They help create a richer, more useful experience for your audience.
Chapter your next episode with PodChapters!
Chapter your next episode with PodChapters
Podcast chapters help your audience follow your content, find the sections they care about, and return to useful information later. They can also display time-based images and provide links exactly when your audience needs them.
PodChapters makes the process much faster. You can import your MP3, bring your own transcript or let PodChapters create one, and then generate chapters automatically or use your outline to find the chapter locations. You can fine-tune the timing, add images or links, and export chapters in formats such as MP3 chapters, Podcasting 2.0, Podlove, and YouTube timestamps.
That’s a lot more useful than a list of timestamps sitting in your show notes. Try it free for seven days and see how it fits your workflow.
1. Unity is strength
Here’s a statement that might sound controversial: diversity is not our strength. Unity is.
Think about the great things people accomplish together. Building a skyscraper, going to the moon, developing a new technology, raising a family, and building a successful business all require people to work toward something together.
A podcast is no different. When you and your cohost are unified around the purpose of the show, you can work together to create better content and a better experience for your audience.
Unity doesn’t mean you have identical opinions. It doesn’t mean you never question each other. It means you agree about the bigger things, such as what the podcast is about, whom it serves, and what value you want to provide.
A podcasting conference is strong because its content is unified around podcasting. If the sessions were about completely unrelated subjects, it wouldn’t really be a podcasting conference anymore. Your podcast needs that same kind of focus.
There are exceptions. A debate-style podcast may be built around opposing views. For example, I once considered creating a tech news podcast from the perspective of a Windows fan and a Mac fan. That could have been entertaining because the disagreement would have been part of the show’s promise.
But for most cohosted podcasts, it’s healthier to have more agreement than disagreement. Be unified about what you’re trying to accomplish, even when you see individual topics differently.
2. Diverse perspectives create depth
When you and your cohost come from different backgrounds, you will notice different things. That doesn’t automatically mean you disagree.
Think of the familiar example of several blind people describing an elephant. One feels the trunk. Another feels a leg. Another feels the ear. They are describing different parts of the same animal. They aren’t necessarily contradicting each other. They are contributing different perspectives to a shared understanding.
Your podcast can benefit from the same thing. You and your cohost may have different experiences, interests, beliefs, or areas of expertise. Even if you have watched the same television show, read the same book, or experienced the same event, different details may stand out to each of you.
That creates depth.
You don’t have to force disagreements. Instead, welcome different observations and ask your cohost to explain what they noticed and why it mattered to them. The conversation becomes more interesting because your audience gets to approach the subject from multiple angles.
You may still disagree about a theory or conclusion, and that’s fine. But the goal isn’t to manufacture conflict. The goal is to give your audience a fuller understanding.
3. Depth reveals divergence
As you explore a topic more deeply, you will naturally find places where your perspectives diverge.
You might begin by agreeing that something is good, useful, or worth discussing. But as you examine it more closely, you may discover that you appreciate different parts of it or reach different conclusions about why it works.
Food is a simple example. Two people might agree that they love the same dessert. One person may love the crunch. Another may appreciate the layered flavors. Someone else may enjoy the sweetness, while another person notices a slight bitterness.
They’re all talking about the same dessert. Their deeper explanations reveal different preferences.
The same thing happens in podcast conversations. You may agree about the main subject, but diverge in your descriptions, applications, theories, or conclusions. Those differences don’t weaken the conversation. They can make it more insightful.
So don’t look for disagreement at the beginning. Start with the shared interest, then go deeper. The divergence will often appear naturally.
4. Podcast with energy givers, not takers or wasters
The most important question may not be whether someone agrees or disagrees with you. It may be whether they give energy to the conversation.
An energy giver builds on what the other person says. They might respond, “That’s a great idea. I hadn’t thought about it that way,” and then add their own perspective. Even when they disagree, they remain engaged and help move the conversation forward.
An energy taker does the opposite. They drain the enthusiasm from the discussion. You bring an exciting idea, and they respond with, “No. That was horrible,” without adding anything useful. The disagreement itself isn’t necessarily the problem. It’s the way the disagreement shuts down the conversation.
Then there are energy wasters. These people may agree with everything, but contribute nothing beyond “Yeah.” They repeat what you just said, leave awkward gaps, or fail to add another insight, example, or question.
That’s when one of you may actually be unnecessary. Not because you agree, but because one person is wasting the momentum of the conversation.
A good cohost can agree, disagree, question, clarify, and build on your ideas. The common thread is that they contribute energy and value.
So, when you evaluate a potential cohost, don’t focus only on whether they have opposing opinions. Look for someone who is unified with you about the purpose of the podcast, brings different perspectives, explores topics with you, and gives energy to the conversation.
That combination is much more valuable than disagreement for its own sake.
If you love The Audacity to Podcast and value the podcasting inspiration and education I provide, would you please consider giving back what it's worth to you?
Supercharge your podcast engagement and grow your podcast!
Do you ever feel like your podcast is stuck? Like you're pouring your heart into your podcast but it seems like no one is listening?
Try Podgagement to help you supercharge your podcast endgagement!
Get speakable pages to simplify engaging with your audience, accept voicemail feedback (with automatic transcripts), see and share your ratings and reviews from nearly 200 places, follow your podcast rankings across nearly 34,000 global charts, discover networking opportunities, and more!
Ask your questions or share your feedback
- Comment on the episode
- Send a written or voicemail message here
Follow The Audacity to Podcast
- Apple Podcasts, Spotify, other Android apps, or in your favorite podcast app.
- Subscribe on YouTube for Podcasting Videos by The Audacity to Podcast
- Follow @theDanielJLewis on X-Twitter
Disclosure
This post may contain links to products or services with which I have an affiliate relationship. I may receive compensation from your actions through such links. However, I don't let that corrupt my perspective and I don't recommend only affiliates.
Related Content
Your comment about “podcasting conferences” is good for sure. It made me think of a podcasting conference I went to recently that was for higher education podcasters. Yes, the entire conference was devoted to podcasting . . . but for the first time . . . not for me.
I had never before experienced such a stark difference in podcasting information needs. Since I am a solo narrated podcast, I guess it would be akin to going to a conference all about how to do podcast guest interviews.
So your point about focus is fantastic. Very true. But I definitely learned that the more niche you are, the more niche your focus needs to be to be effective.